新聞群組： comp.lang.ruby
"Peter Ertl" <p...@gmx.org>
日期： Thu, 15 Dec 2005 03:16:29 +0900
主旨： ruby beats them all
that why I love ruby (and functional languages in general)
複製內容到剪貼板
代碼:
def fibonacci(n)
a, b = 1, 1
n.times do
a, b = b, a + b
end
a
end elegance beats ignorance (ruby vs. java)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirc...@gmail.com>
日期：Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:27:08 +0900
That's not functional...
How about really doing it functional?
複製內容到剪貼板
代碼:
def fib(n)
(1..n-2).inject([1, 1]) { |(a, b), n| [b, a+b] }.last
end :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edward Faulkner <e...@alum.mit.edu>
日期： Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:58:15 +0900
If we're talking about elegance, I prefer this one. It reads just
like the definition of the sequence:
複製內容到剪貼板
代碼:
def fib(n)
n > 1 ? fib(n-1) + fib(n-2) : n
end You can even make it run efficiently by memoizing it. :-)
-Ed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Andrew Backer" <awbac...@gmail.com>
日期： 14 Dec 2005 22:37:43 -0800複製內容到剪貼板
代碼:
def calc_iterative(n)
a = [0,1,0]
for i in 2..n
a[k] = a[k-1] + a[k-2]
end
return a[n%3]
end I like this one, since it uses array wrapping. So many ways to write
it that are all *slightly* different... But this was to show someone,
so :)
